Note: This page contains content and documents (including PDF) that have been automatically translated using Deepl.

17.3 Task of the Agencies and the higher education institutions in program accreditation

17.4 In which cases are conditions imposed?

17.5 Does a higher education institution have to make it transparent that a study programme does not qualify students for a regulated profession? Does the external presentation have to be checked during accreditation?

17.6 In the case of regulated study programmes, is there a mandatory need for an organizational link between the accreditation procedure and the procedure for determining the professional licensing of a study programme in accordance with § 35 MRVO? Do other peer review reports have to be consulted in order to assess the fulfillment of professional requirements?

17.7 Task of the system-accredited higher education institutions and the agency assessing the system

18.01 What is meant by 'essential changes'?

18.02 What can constitute an essential change to the subject of accreditation?

18.03 What is the Accreditation Council's position on essential changes?

18.04 What are definitely essential changes?

18.05 What are generally essential changes in terms of content?

18.06 What are generally not essential changes?

18.07 How do I notify an essential change and what documents do I need to submit?

18.08 What is checked and what decisions are possible?

18.09 Do I indicate essential changes before I make them, or afterwards?

18.10 My study programme is changing the institution - is this an essential change?

18.11 What are the essential changes in system accreditation?